LLM discourse within science typically polarizes around two positions David Hogg clearly identifies: full automation, where we delegate control to machines and become output curators, and complete prohibition, where we pretend we're in 2019 and penalize prompt users. Both approaches prove inadequate. Full automation leads, within years, to human cosmic studies' demise: machines can generate manuscripts approximately 100,000 times faster than human teams, and the resulting deluge would overwhelm literature beyond usability for intended audiences. Complete prohibition violates academic freedom, proves unenforceable, and demands early-career scientists compete while senior faculty secretly use automated systems. Neither policy demonstrates seriousness. Both primarily reflect projection.
肯特大学暴发脑膜炎疫情后，学生正在接种乙型脑膜炎疫苗
ВСУ ударили по Брянску британскими ракетами. Под обстрел попал завод, есть жертвы19:57
Актриса Ирина Горбачева показала фото топлес и рассказала о жизни с РПП20:41
CONTRIBUTING.md